The two critics obviously differ in opinion for the movie "Spiderman 2" Todd Gilchrist found the movie to be good, but he found flaws to it. He mentioned how there are scenes in the movie that don't really need to be there. He found it was a waste of time. He also thought that some things in the movie were belabored. All in all, he thought it was a good movie. He mentioned that comic book readers would like the movie more because it stays close to the comic. That's where Roger Ebert comes in.
Roger Ebert must have been a comic book reader because he didn't really find any flaws to the movie. He thought it was one of the best movies. He said that it doesn't matter if a person reads comics or not, he or she will like the movie regardless. He said that every scene was exciting, no matter if it was an action scene or a dialogue scene.
In all Gilchirist liked the movie, but thought that that it was weak in some areas. Ebert thought the movie was great and found no flaws.
No comments:
Post a Comment